Law Cap
Law Cap
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • BLOG
  • DEFAMATION
  • ABOUT US
  • TERMS OF USE
  • RCMP FCC Lit
  • K. MCLEAN V. HM THE KING
  • MCLEAN V. TPS/GOLDVIEW
  • LTO FRAUD - RECTIFICATION
  • MCLEAN V. LAT (OIPC)
  • PIPEDA - ZOOM REQUEST
  • MCLEAN V TDHA/SNIC/TDGIC
  • McLean v. Archives ONT
  • Reign/RCMP - Corruption
  • McLean v. RCMP - Costs
  • McLean - AG - Motion Rec
  • McLean v. TDHA (DC) NOM 1
  • McLean v TDHA NOM 1 Subs
  • McLean/TDHA Motion Rec 1
  • McLean/TDHA COM NOM #1
  • McLean/TDHA Order NOM 1
  • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Form 37
  • McLean NOM 2 Filing Confi
  • McLean/TDHA Factum NOM 2
  • McLean TDHA MOT Rec NOM 2
  • McLean/TDHA Confirm NOM 2
  • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Order
  • McLean/TDHA COMPEND 0626
  • McLean/TD Compendium Vol2
  • McLean/TD COMPEN V3 0626
  • McLean/HMTK -BOA VOL 1
  • McLean/HMTK BOA Vol. 2
  • McLean/TDHA BOA 312 Tabs
  • McLean v. RCMP BOA
  • MAG Court Doc Access
  • McLean/RCMP NOM 2 Submiss
  • Court Transcripts Manual
  • CJC Complaint Whyte Nowak
  • New CJ SCJ ONT - Boucher
  • Jurist Integrity Dossier
  • McLean/AGC - fraud order
  • MCLEAN v. TDI (LAT)
  • AGC TD Ins. Consortium
  • Crim Gang Attack - McLean
  • KAM LS PreRAM D Knowledge
  • KAM/LS POSTRAM D KNOWLEDG
  • KAM Finds PII - Ethereum
  • LSBC Admit RAM DUMP
  • LSBC/LIF FS Forensically
  • More
    • Home
    • FAQ
    • BLOG
    • DEFAMATION
    • ABOUT US
    • TERMS OF USE
    • RCMP FCC Lit
    • K. MCLEAN V. HM THE KING
    • MCLEAN V. TPS/GOLDVIEW
    • LTO FRAUD - RECTIFICATION
    • MCLEAN V. LAT (OIPC)
    • PIPEDA - ZOOM REQUEST
    • MCLEAN V TDHA/SNIC/TDGIC
    • McLean v. Archives ONT
    • Reign/RCMP - Corruption
    • McLean v. RCMP - Costs
    • McLean - AG - Motion Rec
    • McLean v. TDHA (DC) NOM 1
    • McLean v TDHA NOM 1 Subs
    • McLean/TDHA Motion Rec 1
    • McLean/TDHA COM NOM #1
    • McLean/TDHA Order NOM 1
    • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Form 37
    • McLean NOM 2 Filing Confi
    • McLean/TDHA Factum NOM 2
    • McLean TDHA MOT Rec NOM 2
    • McLean/TDHA Confirm NOM 2
    • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Order
    • McLean/TDHA COMPEND 0626
    • McLean/TD Compendium Vol2
    • McLean/TD COMPEN V3 0626
    • McLean/HMTK -BOA VOL 1
    • McLean/HMTK BOA Vol. 2
    • McLean/TDHA BOA 312 Tabs
    • McLean v. RCMP BOA
    • MAG Court Doc Access
    • McLean/RCMP NOM 2 Submiss
    • Court Transcripts Manual
    • CJC Complaint Whyte Nowak
    • New CJ SCJ ONT - Boucher
    • Jurist Integrity Dossier
    • McLean/AGC - fraud order
    • MCLEAN v. TDI (LAT)
    • AGC TD Ins. Consortium
    • Crim Gang Attack - McLean
    • KAM LS PreRAM D Knowledge
    • KAM/LS POSTRAM D KNOWLEDG
    • KAM Finds PII - Ethereum
    • LSBC Admit RAM DUMP
    • LSBC/LIF FS Forensically
EXPLORE DE FACTO FILED COURT DOCS
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • BLOG
  • DEFAMATION
  • ABOUT US
  • TERMS OF USE
  • RCMP FCC Lit
  • K. MCLEAN V. HM THE KING
  • MCLEAN V. TPS/GOLDVIEW
  • LTO FRAUD - RECTIFICATION
  • MCLEAN V. LAT (OIPC)
  • PIPEDA - ZOOM REQUEST
  • MCLEAN V TDHA/SNIC/TDGIC
  • McLean v. Archives ONT
  • Reign/RCMP - Corruption
  • McLean v. RCMP - Costs
  • McLean - AG - Motion Rec
  • McLean v. TDHA (DC) NOM 1
  • McLean v TDHA NOM 1 Subs
  • McLean/TDHA Motion Rec 1
  • McLean/TDHA COM NOM #1
  • McLean/TDHA Order NOM 1
  • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Form 37
  • McLean NOM 2 Filing Confi
  • McLean/TDHA Factum NOM 2
  • McLean TDHA MOT Rec NOM 2
  • McLean/TDHA Confirm NOM 2
  • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Order
  • McLean/TDHA COMPEND 0626
  • McLean/TD Compendium Vol2
  • McLean/TD COMPEN V3 0626
  • McLean/HMTK -BOA VOL 1
  • McLean/HMTK BOA Vol. 2
  • McLean/TDHA BOA 312 Tabs
  • McLean v. RCMP BOA
  • MAG Court Doc Access
  • McLean/RCMP NOM 2 Submiss
  • Court Transcripts Manual
  • CJC Complaint Whyte Nowak
  • New CJ SCJ ONT - Boucher
  • Jurist Integrity Dossier
  • McLean/AGC - fraud order
  • MCLEAN v. TDI (LAT)
  • AGC TD Ins. Consortium
  • Crim Gang Attack - McLean
  • KAM LS PreRAM D Knowledge
  • KAM/LS POSTRAM D KNOWLEDG
  • KAM Finds PII - Ethereum
  • LSBC Admit RAM DUMP
  • LSBC/LIF FS Forensically
EXPLORE DE FACTO FILED COURT DOCS

McLean v. RCMP Costs: Applicant's Submissions

Why Does the Applicant Seek Full‑Indemnity Costs?

 This page contains the Applicant’s Costs Submissions in McLean v. RCMP et al, filed July 15, 2026 pursuant to Rules 400 and 401 of the Federal Courts Rules. The submissions seek full‑indemnity costs in the amount of $100,000, payable forthwith, based on allegations of institutional bad faith, procedural obstruction, and the introduction of a fabricated July 2 directive attributed to Justice Whyte Nowak. The document outlines the statutory framework governing costs, the mandatory trigger under Rule 401(2), the Respondents’ continuing default, and the jurisprudential basis for elevated costs where conduct undermines the administration of justice. It further addresses non‑party liability, wrongful intermeddling, and the necessity of a lump‑sum award under Nova Chemicals. This page forms part of LawCap’s Federal Court litigation archive documenting high‑profile procedural, constitutional, and institutional‑integrity matters. 

Download the Applicant’s Costs Brief

 GOOGLE MY BUSINESS 

The information on this website is provided for public interest, public education, and general informational purposes only. No legal advice is given, and no solicitor–client relationship, fiduciary relationship, or confidential relationship is formed by accessing, reading, or interacting with this website or its content.

All commentary, analysis, opinions, summaries, interpretations, and descriptions of legal matters are non‑legal information and not a substitute for independent legal advice. You should consult a qualified lawyer for advice regarding your specific situation.

Some information, documents, commentary, or data published on this website may lower the reputation of certain persons in the eyes of a reasonable person. All such content is published in good faith, in the public interest, and is protected by the applicable legal defences, including but not limited to: truth, qualified privilege, absolute privilege, fair comment, honest opinion, and the journalistic/public‑interest responsible communication defence recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada.

No cause of action arises from the publication of this material.

If you believe any information requires correction, clarification, amendment, or contextual addition, we welcome professional, respectful, and non‑abusive dialogue. Please contact us to discuss any concerns.  Copyright © 2026 Law Cap  - All Rights Reserved. 

Powered by

  • ABOUT US
  • TERMS OF USE
  • RCMP FCC Lit
  • K. MCLEAN V. HM THE KING
  • MCLEAN V. TPS/GOLDVIEW
  • LTO FRAUD - RECTIFICATION
  • MCLEAN V. LAT (OIPC)
  • PIPEDA - ZOOM REQUEST
  • MCLEAN V TDHA/SNIC/TDGIC
  • McLean v. Archives ONT
  • Reign/RCMP - Corruption
  • McLean v. RCMP - Costs
  • McLean - AG - Motion Rec
  • McLean v. TDHA (DC) NOM 1
  • McLean v TDHA NOM 1 Subs
  • McLean/TDHA Motion Rec 1
  • McLean/TDHA COM NOM #1
  • McLean/TDHA Order NOM 1
  • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Form 37
  • McLean NOM 2 Filing Confi
  • McLean/TDHA Factum NOM 2
  • McLean TDHA MOT Rec NOM 2
  • McLean/TDHA Confirm NOM 2
  • McLean/TDHA NOM 2 Order
  • McLean/TDHA COMPEND 0626
  • McLean/TD Compendium Vol2
  • McLean/TD COMPEN V3 0626
  • McLean/HMTK -BOA VOL 1
  • McLean/HMTK BOA Vol. 2
  • McLean/TDHA BOA 312 Tabs
  • McLean v. RCMP BOA
  • MAG Court Doc Access
  • McLean/RCMP NOM 2 Submiss
  • Court Transcripts Manual
  • CJC Complaint Whyte Nowak
  • New CJ SCJ ONT - Boucher
  • Jurist Integrity Dossier
  • McLean/AGC - fraud order
  • MCLEAN v. TDI (LAT)
  • AGC TD Ins. Consortium
  • Crim Gang Attack - McLean
  • KAM LS PreRAM D Knowledge
  • KAM/LS POSTRAM D KNOWLEDG
  • KAM Finds PII - Ethereum
  • LSBC Admit RAM DUMP
  • LSBC/LIF FS Forensically

LAWCAP WEBSITE USES COOKIES

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

DeclineAccept